The Cost of Fuel Cycle and Competitiveness of Nuclear Power
JI Biao,LIU Chuan-de
(Qinshan Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Haiyan of Zhejiang Prov. 314300, China)
Abstract: The price of nuclear fuel is rising and changeable in international market at present, which influences the cost and development of the nuclear power in China. This thesis suggests a plan to control the whole cost of the fuel cycle, to improve the competitiveness of nuclear power in China, to accelerate the development of both fuel cycle and nuclear power industries.
Key Words: nuclear power; nuclear fuel cycle; cost control
The uranium (U3O8) price in the international market has been $7/lb. in 2003, increasing to $20/lb. in 2004 and $40 to 70 lb. in 2006, and once it has been up to $136/lb. in June of 2007, since when the price has rapidly declined, and staying around $50/lb. currently. For the changes see Figure 1.

Figure 1 Trends of Uranium Price in International Market
With rapid rising of the overall fuel price and the short-term volatile movement, it’s unavoidable for the nuclear power industry to consider how the competitiveness of nuclear power in
1 Overview of Nuclear Power Competitiveness in
In recent years, the power construction in
Table 1 Outline of Electric Power in China in 2009
|
Indicators |
Unit |
2009 |
Yearly Growth Rate |
|
Installed power-generating capacity |
10 thousand kilowatts |
87407 |
10% |
|
Hydropower |
10 thousand kilowatts |
19679 |
14% |
|
Thermal power |
10 thousand kilowatts |
65205 |
8% |
|
Nuclear power |
10 thousand kilowatts |
908 |
|
|
Wind power |
10 thousand kilowatts |
1613 |
92% |
|
Power generation equipment utilization hours of the electric power plant of 6,000 kilowatts or above |
Hour |
4527 |
-2% |
|
Hydropower |
Hour |
3264 |
-10% |
|
Thermal power |
Hour |
4839 |
-1% |
|
Nuclear power |
Hour |
7914 |
1% |
|
Wind power |
Hour |
1861 |
-10% |
The proportion of nuclear power in total power generation in
There are three main factors to reflect the competitiveness, including brand, quality and price, with the respective analysis as follows:
①BRAND. The nuclear power is thought better by the public due to high technology,being safe and clean, however, the nuclear accidents of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl have also brought certain negative effects to the public together with the fear that cannot be ignored, damaging the brand reputation of nuclear power. The safety comparison between the nuclear power and other powers is similar to that between the aircraft and the automobile, that is, the aircraft is essentially much safer than the automobile, but being worried more than the auto. Therefore, it’s important to enhance the nuclear power promotion and establish positive image of nuclear power to the public. As the nuclear power runs safely and stably for more than twenty years, the positive nuclear image is gradually restored. It’s certainly that the nuclear brand shall be maintained by every nuclear power plant. ②QUALITY. The nuclear power is advantageous to keep long-term stable operation, but with the defects of poor peak regulation capacity and being difficult to adjust the power level, therefore, in case of power shortage in the market, the nuclear is better than the thermal power and the hydropower on quality, while in case of excessive market power, the nuclear is worse than the thermal power and the hydropower on peak regulation, which is clearly shown in Table 1, besides, the utilization hours of nuclear power generation is much higher than that of other powers (also with the case that the thermal utilization hours is influenced due to price competition of the coal and electricity). Due to power shortage of
③PRICE. As a common commodity used by everyone, the power price fluctuation is sensitive to the public, while the price competitiveness is based on the advantages of low cost, so it’s unquestionable that the cost plays an important even decisive role in competition.
2 Introduction of the Cycle Cost of Nuclear Fuel
2.1 Concept of nuclear fuel cycle
The fuel for nuclear reactors in the nuclear power plant cannot be exhausted at one time, and must be discharged periodically from the reactor, processed (called reprocessing), enriched, made into fuel element and then replaced into the reactor for recycling. If the nuclear power generation runs for certain period, the fuel element has to be discharged from the reactor and replaced with new fuels regardless of the remained considerable amount of fissile fuel when the excess reactivity is nearly disappeared due to fuel consumption and the poisonous effect of fission product produced and accumulated during the running. The fuel element discharged is called as spent fuel, which contains a large amount of fissile nuclides and convertible nuclides such as 235U (U-235) and 239PU (PU-239), including the original ones not burnt up and the converted ones generated during the operation cycle, all belonging to the precious energy resources. Reprocessing is required to separate the fission products and recycle the fissile nuclide and the convertible nuclide, thus make the fuel element available again for reuse in the reactor, achieving the fuel cycle. The whole process of nuclear fuel cycle includes the following steps:- The steps above is called the front end of fuel cycle
- The steps below is called the back end of fuel cycle
Among the above, the spent fuel disposal plant is the one of the must steps for recycling of uranium and plutonium resources.
1509, Zhongyu Plaza, A6 Gongti North Road,Chaoyang District, Beijing China | tel: +86 10 64681222
Dynabond Powertech © 2010. All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Sitemap | Web Design Beijing by Crystal Asia.